Particles

An

An (interrog. particle): whether, if (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question. (Also see –ne, utrum, and nesciō for common constructions using this word.)

An can start a direct question, often with a nuance of surprise or indignation.

Pessuma, eho an audivisti? —Plautus, Stichus 245-6
Translation

You crook, hey, did you listen to it?

Details

(Talking about an auction.) Pessuma is the feminine vocative singular form of pessumus/pessuma/pessumum (1/2—also pessimus): very bad/worst; very evil/most evil/evilest—the superlative form of malus/mala/malum (1/2): bad; evil. Eho (interj.): hey! look here! An (interrog. particle): whether, if (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question. Audīvistī is the second person singular perfect form of audiō, audīre, audīvī/audiī, audītum (4): to hear; listen (to).

It can also introduce an indirect question (in which case it translates as whether or if).

Dubitas an solum bonum sit. —Seneca, Epistles 76.12
Translation

You doubt whether it is the sole good.

Details

(He’s talking about virtue, or perfected reason.) Dubitās is the second person singular form of dubitō, dubitāre, dubitāvī, dubitātum (1): to doubt; hesitate. An (interrog. particle): whether, if (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question. Sōlus/sōla/sōlum (1/2, irreg.): alone; only, sole. Bonum, bonī (2n): a good thing, a good. Sit is the third person singular subjunctive form of sum, esse, fuī, futūrus (irreg.): to be (subjunctive because it’s in an indirect question).

An often means or between two or more mutually exclusive parts of a question.

Denique interrogo: valentior est quam ratio an infirmior? —Seneca, On Anger 1.8.5
Translation

I ask, in short, is it more powerful or weaker than reason?

Details

(He’s talking about anger—īra, īrae (1f)—which was mentioned in the previous sentence.) Dēnique (adv.): finally, at last; in short, to sum up; besides. Interrogō, interrogāre, interrogāvī, interrogātum (1): to ask; interrogate. Valentior/valentior/valentius (3): stronger, more powerful—the comparative form of valēns, valentis (3, adj.): strong, powerful—originally the present active participle of valeō, valēre, valuī, valitum (2): to be healthy, be well, be strong; be able; be of effect; be worth. Est: is it. Quam (rel. adv.): as; than. Ratiō, ratiōnis (3f): calculation; account; reasoning; reason; method; the way a thing works. An (interrog. particle): whether, if (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question. Īnfirmior/īnfirmior/īnfirmius (3): weaker—the comparative form of īnfirmus/īnfirma/īnfirmum (1/2): weak, feeble, infirm.

Ipse te consule, verane an falsa memoraveris. —Seneca, Natural Questions 4a. pr.18
Translation

Ask yourself whether the things you listed are true or false.

More literally: Ask yourself yourself whether you said true or false things.

Details

(The flattering things you’ve just said about yourself.) Ipse/ipsa/ipsum (pron. or adj.): himself/herself yourself/etc. ; in person; the very. Tē is the accusative form of tū: you (used reflexively: yourself). Cōnsule is the singular imperative form of cōnsulō, cōnsulere, cōnsuluī, cōnsultum (3): to consult, ask one’s opinion; give thought to. Vērane: vēra is the neuter accusative plural form of vērus/vēra/vērum (1/2): true; the enclitic interrogative particle –ne turns the word into part of a question, and is translated as whether or if when the question is indirect. An (interrog. particle): whether, if (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question. Falsa is the neuter accusative plural form of falsus/falsa/falsum (1/2): false. Memorāverīs is the second person singular perfect subjunctive form of memorō, memorāre, memorāvī, memorātum (1): to recount, relate, speak about, tell, say, mention; recall to mind (subjunctive because it’s in an indirect question).

Cui illas assignabimus? Zenoni an Cleanthi an Chrysippo an Panaetio an Posidonio? —Seneca, Epistles 33.4
Translation

To whom shall we credit them? To Zeno, Cleanthes, Chrysippus, Panaetius, or Posidonius?

Details

(He’s talking about thoughts or sayings—sententia, sententiae (1f).) Cui is the m/f/n dative singular form of quis/quis/quid (interrog. pron.): who? what? Illās is the feminine accusative plural form of ille/illa/illud (pron.): that; he, she, it. Assignābimus is the first person plural future form of assignō, assignāre, assignāvī, assignātum (1—also appears as adsignō): to assign; impute, ascribe, credit; commit (to someone’s keeping). Zēnōnī is the dative singular form of Zēnō, Zēnōnis (3m—also Zēnōn). An (interrog. particle): whether, if (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question (notice how an is repeated between all the options—unlike the English or, which tends to come only between the last two). Cleanthī is the dative singular form of Cleanthēs, Cleanthis (3m). Chrȳsippō is the dative singular form of Chrȳsippus, Chrȳsippī (2m). Panaetiō is the dative singular form of Panaetius, Panaetiī (2m). Posīdōniō is the dative singular form of Posīdōnius, Posīdōniī (2m). (The proper names are those of various Stoic philosophers.)

It can sometimes translate as or even when it starts a question:

An hoc parum magnum est? —Seneca, On the Happy Life 9.4
Translation

Or does this seem to you too small a thing?

More literally: Or is this not great enough?

Details

(Speaking about virtue, and whether it must be sought for the sake of something else.) An (interrog. particle): whether, if (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question. Hic/haec/hoc (pron.): this; he, she, it. Parum (adv.): (too) little, not enough. Magnus/magna/magnum (1/2): great, large; important. Est: is.


Autem

Autem (particle): on the other hand, while, whereas, but, however; and, moreover; now; for my/your/his/etc. part, as for me/you/him/etc. A postpositive particle (it usually appears second in a sentence). Autem serves to convey a mild contrast, to move on to the next step in a reasoning, to mark a parenthetical comment, or to transition to a new topic or development. It has no exact equivalent in English. It can translate in a variety of ways depending on context, and in some cases it’s best not translated directly at all, as we’ll see.

Latin didn’t use punctuation to mark the end of sentences; the marks you see now were all added later by editors. The Romans used other conventions to signal the end of one sentence and the start of the next, and to signal the relationships between sentences. Discourse particles such as autem (or enim) are examples. These words are a little like conjunctions, but they connect clauses in a different way. They mark the start of a new thought and suggest how it relates to what was just said. This can make it hard to fully illustrate the meaning of such words with a single sentence; the entire sense of them requires seeing the previous sentence, too. But these examples can at least be suggestive.

Puta autem me vetare. —Seneca, Epistles 99.15
Translation

(Chicago:) But suppose I did forbid it.

More literally: But suppose me to forbid (it).

Details

Putā is the singular imperative form of putō, putāre, putāvī, putātum (1): to think, suppose. Autem (particle): on the other hand, while, whereas, but, however; and, moreover; now; for my/your/his/etc. part, as for me/you/him/etc. Mē is the accusative form of ego: I (me). Vetō, vetāre, vetuī, vetitum (1): to forbid, veto.

Quod autem vivere est diu mori? —Seneca, Epistles 101.13
Translation

But what sort of life is a lingering death?

(Chicago:) But what kind of life is protracted dying?

More literally: But what living is dying for a long time?

Details

Quī/quae/quod (interrog. adj.): which. . . ? what. . . ? what kind of. . . ? Autem (particle): on the other hand, while, whereas, but, however; and, moreover; now; for my/your/his/etc. part, as for me/you/him/etc. Vīvō, vīvere, vīxī, vīctum (3): to live. Est: it. Diū (adv.): long, for a long time. Morior, morī, mortuus sum (3, –ior, deponent): to die.

Poterimus autem, adnitamur modo. —Seneca, On Anger 3.42.1
Translation

Moreover, we can do it, if only we shall make the effort.

More literally: We will be able, moreover, if only we try/if only we should try (or in less modern English: . . . should we just try).

Details

(After stating the urgency of overcoming anger.) Poterimus is the first person plural future form of possum, posse, potuī, — (irreg.): to be able, can. Autem (particle): on the other hand, while, whereas, but, however; and, moreover; now; for my/your/his/etc. part, as for me/you/him/etc. Adnītāmur is the first person plural subjunctive form of adnītor, adnītī, adnīsus sum (3, deponent): to lean or rest (on); try, strive. Modo (adv.): only, just; (with subjunctive) only provided that, if only.

Tu eum orato, ego autem orabo vilicum. —Plautus, Casina 273
Translation

You ask him, and I will ask the overseer.

Details

Tū: you. Eum is the masculine accusative singular form of is/ea/id (pron.): he, she, it; this, that. Ōrātō is the singular future imperative form of ōrō, ōrāre, ōrāvī, ōrātum (1): to pray (to), beseech, beg, ask, supplicate; speak in court, plead. Ego: I. Autem (particle): on the other hand, while, whereas, but, however; and, moreover; now; for my/your/his/etc. part, as for me/you/him/etc. Ōrābō is the first person singular future form of ōrō, ōrāre, ōrāvī, ōrātum (1): to pray (to), beseech, beg, ask, supplicate; speak in court, plead. Vīlicum is the accusative singular form of vīlicus, vīlicī (2m): overseer of an estate.

As noted above, sometimes translating autem into a specific English word isn’t really necessary. The word is just signaling the relationship between one clause and another, and the relationship may be apparent without being expressed directly. It’ll be useful now to see a few examples of this kind—cases where autem naturally goes untranslated but still provides useful information. It’s usually easiest to do that here by showing the context in parentheses.

Rhenus autem oritur ex Lepontiis qui Alpes incolunt. —Caesar, The Gallic War 4.10.3
Translation

(No more than eighty miles from the ocean, it (the river Meuse) flows into the Rhine.) The Rhine rises in the land of the Lepontii, who inhabit the Alps.

Details

(Here the untranslated autem marks a transition to a new topic. He’s been talking about the river Meuse, which flows into the Rhine; then he turns to the Rhine itself. If you were to insist on translating autem explicitly, you could say as for the Rhine (itself), it rises. . .) Rhēnus, Rhēnī (2m): the Rhine river. Autem (particle): on the other hand, while, whereas, but, however; and, moreover; now; for my/your/his/etc. part, as for me/you/him/etc. Oritur is the third person singular form of orior, orīrī, ortus sum (3, –ior/4, deponent): to come into being, be born, arise; rise. Ex/ē (prep.): from, out of (takes ablative). Lēpontiīs is the ablative form of Lēpontiī, Lēpontiōrum (2m, plural): the Lepontii, a Gallic people. Quī is the masculine nominative plural form of quī/quae/quod (rel. pron.): who, which, that, what. Alpēs is the accusative form of Alpēs, Alpium (3f, plural): the Alps. Incolunt is the third person plural form of incolō, incolere, incoluī, — (3): to inhabit.

De Faberio autem, cum venerit. —Cicero, Letters to Atticus 13.28.1
Translation

(As you were going to inspect the property today, you’ll no doubt be sending me your views tomorrow.) You will let me know about Faberius when he comes.

Details

(You will let me know is implied. This illustration is similar to the previous one. Cicero changes topic and uses autem to mark the transition. A more explicit translation: As for Faberius, you’ll let me know about him. . .) Dē (prep.): from, down from; about, concerning (takes the ablative). Faberiō is the m/n (here m) ablative singular form of Faberius/Faberia/Faberium (1/2): Roman nomen, here of a debtor of Cicero (and possibly a secretary of Caesar). Autem (particle): on the other hand, while, whereas, but, however; and, moreover; now; for my/your/his/etc. part, as for me/you/him/etc. Cum (conj.): when; since; while; although. Vēnerit is the third person singular future perfect form of veniō, venīre, vēnī, ventum (4): to come.

Erat autem exul Rhodius. —Livy, History of Rome 37.10.1
Translation

(That line is the parenthetical in the following sentence.) While this was happening in the Hellespont, the king’s officer Polyxenidas (he was an exile from Rhodes) had heard that a fleet of his countrymen had left home.

Details

(Autem here signals a parenthetical statement.) Erat: he was—the third person singular imperfect form of sum, esse, fuī, futūrus (irreg.): to be. Autem (particle): on the other hand, while, whereas, but, however; and, moreover; now; for my/your/his/etc. part, as for me/you/him/etc. Exul, exulis (3m/f—also exsul): exile, banished person. Rhodius/Rhodia/Rhodium (1/2): Rhodian, from or belonging to Rhodes.

Erant autem cum eo quinque milia peditum. —Livy, History of Rome 33.14.12
Translation

(When preparations for the appointed day were complete, he forthwith set off by night through the land of Phlius and reached Cleonae with nobody aware of his plans.) With him were 5,000 infantry.

Details

(Here autem introduces an additional piece of information.) Erant: (they/there) were—the third person plural imperfect form of sum, esse, fuī, futūrus (irreg.): to be. Autem (particle): on the other hand, while, whereas, but, however; and, moreover; now; for my/your/his/etc. part, as for me/you/him/etc. Cum (prep.): with (takes the ablative). Eō is the m/n ablative singular form of is/ea/id (pron.): he, she, it; this, that. Quīnque (indeclinable): five. Mīlia is the nominative plural form of mīlle: thousand (with plural forms of this numeral, the things counted go in the partitive genitive). Peditum is the genitive plural form of pedes, peditis (3m): one who goes on foot; foot soldier.

Quod homo est, non est hoc equus; homo autem animal est: equus igitur animal non est. —Gellius, Attic Nights 18.13.5
Translation

A horse is not what a man is; man is an animal, therefore a horse is not an animal.

Details

(Offered as a specimen of bad logic; autem introduces the next step in the reasoning.) Quī/quae/quod (rel. pron.): who, which, that, what. Homō, hominis (3m): man, human. Est: is. Nōn: not. Hic/haec/hoc (pron.): this; he, she, it. Equus, equī (2m): horse. Autem (particle): on the other hand, while, whereas, but, however; and, moreover; now; for my/your/his/etc. part, as for me/you/him/etc. Animal, animālis (3n): animal, living thing. Igitur (conj.): so, therefore, then.


Enim

Enim (particle): for, indeed, truly, after all, well, you see. Enim is a postpositive word (i.e., it comes second in a sentence). It’s usually translated as for. It suggests that the new sentence will provide some elaboration or explanation of what was just said. (Professor Fontaine has suggested that the best translation for enim in modern American English is you see.)
Non opus est accusare; nihil enim tibi proderit. —Seneca the Elder, Controversies 2.3.15
Translation

There is no need to accuse him—for it will do you no good.

More literally: —for it will avail you nothing.

Details

Nōn: not. Opus, operis (3n): work, labor, toil; (in the expression opus esse) need. Est: there is. Accūsō, accūsāre, accūsāvī, accūsātum (1): to blame, accuse, reproach, censure, impugn. Nihil (n, indeclinable, nom. or acc. only—here acc.): nothing; (accusative used adverbially) in nothing, in no respect, to no extent, in no way, not at all. Enim (particle): for, indeed, truly, after all, well, you see. Tibi is the dative form of tū: you. Prōderit is the third person singular future form of prōsum, prōdesse, prōfuī, prōfutūrus (irreg.): to be helpful, be useful, do good, avail (+ dative).

Rationale enim animal est homo. —Seneca, Epistles 41.8
Translation

For man is a reasoning animal.

(Chicago:) For a human being is a rational animal.

Details

Ratiōnālis/ratiōnālis/ratiōnāle (3): dialectical, connected with reasoning; rational, endowed with reason. Enim (particle): for, indeed, truly, after all, well, you see. Animal, animālis (3n): animal, living thing. Est: is. Homō, hominis (3m): man, human being.

Peccavit: hoc enim primum? —Seneca, On Anger 3.27.3
Translation

“He did wrong,” you say. Well, was this the first time?

More literally: He did wrong; well, this (as the) first (thing he did wrong)? Or: . . . for the first time?

Details

Peccāvit is the third person singular perfect form of peccō, peccāre, peccāvī, peccātum (1): to sin, do wrong, commit a fault. Hoc is the neuter accusative singular form of hic/haec/hoc (pron.): this; he, she, it. Enim (particle): for, indeed, truly, after all, well, you see. Prīmum is the m/n accusative singular form of prīmus/prīma/prīmum (1/2): first; foremost; chief—or prīmum (adv.): first, for the first time.


Ergō

Ergō (particle): therefore, so, then.
Quis ergo fecit? —Seneca the Elder, Controversies (excerpts) 8.1.1
Translation

Who then did the deed?

Details

Quis/quis/quid (pron.): who? what? Ergō (particle): therefore, so, then. Fēcit is the third person singular perfect form of faciō, facere, fēcī, factum (3, –iō): to do; make.

Nemo ergo non miser. —Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 1.9
Translation

There is no one then who is not wretched.

More literally: Therefore, no one (is) not wretched.

Details

Nēmō, nēminis (3m): no one. Ergō (particle): therefore, so, then. Nōn: not. Miser/misera/miserum (1/2): wretched, miserable. (The verb est is implied.)

“Quid est ergo ratio?” Naturae imitatio. —Seneca, Epistles 66.39
Translation

What then is reason? The imitation of nature.

Details

Quis/quis/quid (interrog. pron.): who? what? Est: is. Ergō (particle): therefore, so, then. Ratiō, ratiōnis (3f): calculation; reasoning; reason; method; the way a thing works. Nātūra, nātūrae (1f): nature. Imitātiō, imitātiōnis (3f): imitation.

Ergō more rarely can be a preposition meaning on account of or for the sake of. It takes the genitive and follows the genitive word rather than preceeding it; e. g. , eius reī ergō = on account of that thing/fact, on account of that. This usage occurs mostly in legal language.


Etiam

Etiam (particle): still; even; also, too, as well; again; yes.

Etiam can mean still in a temporal sense ( = still now, even now):

Dubitatur etiam? —Seneca, The Mad Hercules 965
Translation

Do you still hesitate?

More literally: Is it still hesitated? (i.e., is there still hesitation?)

Details

Dubitātur is the third person singular passive form of dubitō, dubitāre, dubitāvī, dubitātum (1): to doubt; hesitate (impersonal passive). Etiam (particle): still; even; also, too, as well; again; yes.

But more often it means even or also, too, as well.

Inviolatos nos etiam inimicis iudicamus esse debere. —Seneca, On Anger 2.31.3
Translation

We decide that we ought not to be harmed even by our enemies.

More literally: We judge us to have to be (i.e., we judge that we ought to be) unharmed (or inviolable) even to/by enemies.

Details

Inviolātōs is the masculine accusative plural form of inviolātus/inviolāta/inviolātum (1/2): unharmed, unhurt, undamaged, unviolated; inviolable. Nōs is the accusative form of nōs: we (us, ourselves). Etiam (particle): still; even; also, too, as well; again; yes. Inimīcīs is the dative plural form of inimīcus, inimīcī (2m): enemy. Iūdicāmus is the first person plural form of iūdicō, iūdicāre, iūdicāvī, iūdicātum (1): to judge. Esse: to be. Dēbeō, dēbēre, dēbuī, dēbitum (2): to owe; ought, should, have to.

Officia etiam ferae sentiunt. —Seneca, On Benefits 1.2.5
Translation

Even wild beasts are sensible of good offices.

Alt. : Even wild beasts feel kindnesses.

Details

Officia is the accusative plural form of officium, officiī (2n): a service, kindness, favor, good office; duty; function, office. Etiam (particle): still; even; also, too, as well; again; yes. Ferae is the nominative plural form of fera, ferae (1f): wild animal (a substantive use of ferus/fera/ferum (1/2): wild, fierce, savage, ferocious—the feminine form is used because the noun bēstia, bēstiae (1f, meaning beast) was originally implied). Sentiunt is the third person plural form of sentiō, sentīre, sēnsī, sēnsum (4): to feel; perceive; experience, undergo; think, opine.

Dixerunt etiam alii. —Cicero, Letters to Brutus 5.4
Translation

Others spoke as well.

Details

Dīxērunt is the third person plural perfect form of dīcō, dīcere, dīxī, dictum (3): to say, speak. Etiam (adv.): still; even; also, too, as well; again; yes. Aliī is the masculine nominative plural form of alius/alia/aliud (1/2, irreg.): other, another; different (used as a substantive).

Hoc etiam praestat harena tibi. —Martial, Epigrams 1.14.2
Translation

This too the arena offers you.

Details

Hoc is the neuter accusative singular form of hic/haec/hoc (pron.): this; he, she, it. Etiam (adv.): still; even; also, too, as well; again; yes. Praestat is the third person singular form of praestō, praestāre, praestitī/praestāvī, praestātum/praestitum (1): to excel, be better or best; offer, give, supply, provide. Harēna, harēnae (1f—also arēna): sand; arena. Tibi is the dative form of tū: you.

Nōn sōlum/tantum/modo. . . sed etiam is a frequent construction meaning not only. . . but also/even.

Iudicia nostra non tantum prava sed etiam levia sunt. —Seneca, On Leisure 1.2
Translation

Our choices are not only wrong but also fickle.

Details

Iūdicia is the nominative plural form of iūdicium, iūdiciī (2n): judgment; trial; choice, decision. Nostra is the neuter nominative plural form of noster/nostra/nostrum (1/2): our, ours. Nōn: not. Tantum (adv.): so much; as much; only. Prāva is the neuter nominative plural form of prāvus/prāva/prāvum (1/2): crooked; depraved, wicked; wrong. Sed (conj.): but. Etiam (adv.): still; even; also, too, as well; again; yes. Levia is the neuter nominative plural form of levis/levis/leve (3): light; gentle; easy; fickle. Sunt: (they) are.

Sometimes etiam means again. Etiam atque etiam is a set phrase meaning again and again, persistently, earnestly, insistently.

Hoc te vehementer etiam atque etiam rogo. —Cicero, Letters to Friends 2.7.4
Translation

I beg you so to do as a special favor.

More literally: This I ask you strongly again and again.

Details

Hoc is the neuter accusative singular form of hic/haec/hoc (pron.): this; he, she, it. Tē is the accusative form of tū: you. Vehementer (adv.): strongly; violently; very much, extremely. Etiam (adv.): still; even; also, too, as well; again; yes. Atque/ac (conj.): and, and also, and then. Etiam atque etiam = again and again; earnestly, insistently. Rogō, rogāre, rogāvī, rogātum (1): to ask, request (it can take a double accusative—the thing asked for and the person asked).

Etiam can be used as an affirmative answer or reaction to a question or remark—yes:

“Num quid vis?” “Etiam: ut actutum advenias.” —Plautus, Amphitruo 544
Translation

“Do you want anything?” “Yes, that you come here soon.”

Details

Num (interrog. particle): starts a question, often implying disbelief or tentativeness (is it really. . . ? do you by any chance. . . ?). Quid is the neuter accusative singular form of quis/qua/quid (indef. pron.): anyone, anything; someone, something (it replaces aliquis/aliqua/aliquid in some clauses, especially after sī, nisi, num and nē). Vīs is the second person singular form of volō, velle, voluī, — (irreg.): to want, wish; be willing. Etiam (adv.): still; even; also, too, as well; again; yes. Ut (conj. , with subjunctive): that, so that. Āctūtum (adv.): immediately, quickly, instantly, without delay. Adveniās is the second person singular subjunctive form of adveniō, advenīre, advēnī, adventum (4): to come (to a place), arrive.


Immō

Immō (particle): nay, (or) rather; no, on the contrary; indeed, actually, in fact. It introduces a correction to what was just said, either by contradicting it entirely—e. g. , Estne domī? Immō īn forō est = Is he at home? No, he’s at the market—or by changing it to a more exact (often more forceful) term—e. g. , Habet librōs aliquōs, immō plūrimōs = He has some books, nay, very many books; he has some books—very many, in fact.
“Servi sunt.” Immo homines. —Seneca, Epistles 47.1
Translation

“They are slaves.” Rather, they are men.

Details

Servī is the nominative plural form of servus, servī (2m): slave, servant. Sunt: they are. Immō (particle): nay, (or) rather; no, on the contrary; indeed, actually, in fact (correcting what was just said). Hominēs is the nominative plural form of homō, hominis (3m): man, human being.

“Nihil ignoveris.” Immo aliquid, non omnia. —Cicero, In Defense of Murena 65
Translation

“Never forgive!” No: not on every occasion, but do forgive sometimes.

More literally: “Forgive nothing.” Actually something, not all things.

Details

Nihil (n, indeclinable, nom. or acc. only—here acc.): nothing. Ignōverīs is the second person singular perfect subjunctive form of ignōscō, ignōscere, ignōvī, ignōtum (3): to forgive, pardon (perfect subjunctive because it’s a second-person prohibitive after nihil). Immō (particle): nay, (or) rather; no, on the contrary; indeed, actually, in fact (correcting what was just said). Aliquid is the neuter accusative singular form of aliquis/aliqua/aliquid (pron.): someone, something. Nōn: not. Omnia is the neuter accusative plural form of omnis/omnis/omne (3): all; every; (n. pl. used substantively) all things, everything.

“Haec inter se diversa sunt?” Immo dissimilia. —Seneca, Epistles 35.1
Translation

“Are these words of different meaning?” Nay, more, they are totally unlike in meaning.

More literally: “Are these things different between themselves?” Actually (they’re) dissimilar.

Details

Haec is the neuter nominative plural form of hic/haec/hoc (pron.): this; he, she, it. Inter (prep.): among; between (takes accusative). Sē: themselves—the accusative form of the reflexive pronoun. Dīversa is the neuter nominative plural form of dīversus/dīversa/dīversum (1/2): turned, facing, going, etc. , in a different direction or different directions; situated apart or on opposite sides/on the opposite side; separate; different. Sunt: are (they). Immō (particle): nay, (or) rather; no, on the contrary; indeed, actually, in fact (correcting what was just said). Dissimilia is the neuter nominative plural form of dissimilis/dissimilis/dissimile (3): dissimilar, unlike.


Nam

Nam (particle): for, because (typically to introduce a reason or explanation). Unlike enim, it isn’t postpositive; it usually comes as the first word in its clause.
Nam ego irascor. —Seneca, On Anger 3.12.6
Translation

For I am angry.

Details

(Latin version of Plato explaining why he wanted someone else to inflict a punishment on a slave: he was too angry himself to do it fairly.) Nam (particle): for, because. Ego: I. Īrāscor, īrāscī, īrātus sum (3, deponent): to be or become angry.

Nam pertinet ad omnes perturbationes. —Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 4.27
Translation

For it applies to all disorders.

Details

(He’s been observing the fact that some people are more susceptible than others to certain specific diseases; now he’s saying that’s true generally.) Nam (particle): for, because. Pertinet is the third person singular form of pertineō, pertinēre, pertinuī, — (2): to extend (to a specific point), reach; pertain, apply, matter, belong (to). Ad (prep.): to (takes the accusative). Omnēs is the m/f accusative plural form of omnis/omnis/omne (3): all; every. Perturbātiōnēs is the accusative plural form of perturbātiō, perturbātiōnis (3f): confusion, disorder, disturbance; strong emotion, passion.

Nam idem est honestum et bonum. —Seneca, Epistles 87.25
Translation

For the honorable and the good are identical.

More literally: For the honorable and the good is the same.

Details

(He’s just said that good can’t arise from dishonorable conduct.) Nam (particle): for, because. Īdem/eadem/idem (pron.): the same. Est: is. Honestum, honestī (2n): the honorable, that which is honorable, rectitude (a substantive use of honestus/honesta/honestum (1/2): honorable, noble). Et (conj.): and. Bonum, bonī (1/2): a good thing or that which is good, a good or the good (a substantive use of bonus/bona/bonum (1/2): good).

Percontatorem fugito; nam garrulus idem est. —Horace, Epistles 1.18.69
Translation

Avoid a questioner, for he is also a tattler.

More literally: Avoid a questioner, for the same is talkative.

Details

Percontātōrem is the accusative singular form of percontātor, percontātōris (3m): inquirer, questioner. Fugitō is the singular future imperative form of fugiō, fugere, fūgī, fugitūrus (3, –iō): to flee, run away. Nam (particle): for, because. Garrulus/garrula/garrulum (1/2): talkative, garrulous. Īdem/eadem/idem (pron.): the same. Est: is.


–ne

–ne (enclitic interrogative particle): turns a word into part of a question. It’s attached at the end of the word that is the question’s focus. That word often comes first in the clause, sometimes second or third. The question can be direct or indirect.

When the question is direct, –ne isn’t translated with an individual English word; it’s translated by just arranging the English sentence interrogatively (is it. . . ? are you. . . ? do they. . . ? etc.).

Tum mortemne fugiebam? —Cicero, In Defense of Sestius 47
Translation

Was I then fleeing death?

Details

Tum (adv.): then. Mortemne: mortem is the accusative singular form of mors, mortis (3f): death; the enclitic interrogative particle –ne turns the word into part of a question. Fugiēbam is the first person singular imperfect form of fugiō, fugere, fūgī, fugitūrus (3, –iō): to flee, run away.

When the question is indirect, –ne can be translated as whether or if.

Rogavit essentne fusi hostes. —Cicero, On the Ends of Good and Evil 2.97
Translation

He asked if the enemy forces were routed.

Details

Rogāvit is the third person singular perfect form of rogō, rogāre, rogāvī, rogātum (1): to ask, request, beg, pray, inquire; invite. Essentne fūsī: essent fūsī is the third person masculine plural pluperfect passive form of fundō, fundere, fūdī, fūsum (3): to pour; spread, scatter; rout; the enclitic interrogative particle –ne turns the word into part of a question; when the question is indirect (like here) the particle is typically translated as whether or if. Hostēs is the nominative plural form of hostis, hostis (3m/f): enemy.

When –ne is attached to a negative word, it implies that an affirmative answer to the underlying question is expected (the question may be rhetorical).

Nihilne iis inane videtur? —Cicero, Orator 173
Translation

Do they never have the feeling that something is lacking?

More literally: Does nothing seem empty to them?

Details

(Something must.) Nihilne: nihil (n, indeclinable, nom. or acc. only, here nom.): nothing; the enclitic interrogative particle –ne turns the word into part of a question. Iīs (also eīs or īs) is the m/f/n (here m) dative plural form of is/ea/id (pron.): he, she, it; this, that. Inānis/inānis/ināne (3): empty, void; illusory; foolish, inane. Vidētur is the third person singular passive form of videō, vidēre, vīdī, vīsum (2): to see; (in the passive) seem.

Nemone fuit cui deberet Quinctius? —Cicero, In Defense of Publius Quinctius 73
Translation

Was there no one to whom Quinctius owed money?

Details

(There was.) Nēmōne: nēmō, nēminis (3m): no one; the enclitic interrogative particle –ne turns the word into part of a question. Fuit is the third person singular perfect form of sum, esse, fuī, futūrus (irreg.): to be. Cui is the m/f/n dative singular form of quī/quae/quod (rel. pron.): who, which, that, what (to whom). Dēbēret is the third person singular imperfect subjunctive form of dēbeō, dēbēre, dēbuī, dēbitum (2): to owe; ought (subjunctive because it’s in a relative clause of characteristic). Quīnctius/Quīnctia/Quīnctium (1/2): a Roman family name.

The most common example of this pattern is the attachment of –ne to nōn. The result, nōnne, is so familiar that it’s conventionally treated as a word of its own.

Nonne tibi videatur stultissimus? —Seneca, Epistles 63.11
Translation

Would you not think him an utter fool?

More literally: Would he not seem to you very stupid?

Details

(Yes, you would indeed think he is.) Nōnne (interrog. particle): not—in a question that expects a “yes” answer (nōn = not; the enclitic interrogative particle –ne turns the word into part of a question). Tibi: to you—the dative form of tū: you. Videātur is the third person singular passive subjunctive form of videō, vidēre, vīdī, vīsum (2): to see; (in the passive) seem (subjunctive because it describes potential action—it’s part of a future-less-vivid conditional). Stultissimus/stultissima/stultissimum (1/2): very/most stupid, stupidest—the superlative degree of stultus/stulta/stultum (1/2): stupid.

Nonne caveam ne scelus faciam? —Cicero, Lucullus 133
Translation

Am I not to be careful not to commit a crime?

Details

(I am.) Nōnne (interrog. particle): not—in a question that expects a “yes” answer (nōn = not; the enclitic interrogative particle –ne turns the word into part of a question). Caveam is the first person singular subjunctive form of caveō, cavēre, cāvī, cautum (2): to beware (of); take care; guard against (subjunctive because it’s in a deliberative question) (cavēre nē = to take care that not, be careful not to). Nē (conj. , with subjunctive): lest, that not. Scelus is the accusative singular form of scelus, sceleris (3n): crime. Faciam is the first person singular subjunctive form of faciō, facere, fēcī, factum (3, –iō): to do; make; commit.

Compare the entries on the words num and numquid, which often imply that a negative answer is expected.

–ne can be combined with an in a question that has two or more parts (where you’re being asked which of two or more things is true). –ne goes with the first part; an introduces the second part (and all the subsequent ones if there are more than two).

Advolone an maneo? —Cicero, Letters to Atticus 13.40.2
Translation

Am I to hurry off or stay here?

Details

Advolōne: advolō, advolāre, advolāvī, advolātum (1): to fly (to a place), hasten (to a place); the enclitic interrogative particle –ne turns the word into part of a question. An (interrog. particle): whether (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question. Maneō, manēre, mānsī, mānsum (2): to remain, stay; wait (for). (This illustration shows how a deliberative question can also use the indicative although it often takes the subjunctive.)

Iam cernam, mene an illam potiorem putes. —Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 2.20
Translation

Now I will see if you choose her or me.

More literally: Now I will see if you think me or her preferable.

Details

(Cicero’s Latin rendering of a Greek line from Sophocles.) Iam (adv.): already; now; soon. Cernam is the first person singular future form of cernō, cernere, crēvī, crētum (3): to discern, see. Mēne: mē is the accusative form of ego: I; the enclitic interrogative particle –ne turns the word into part of a question. An (interrog. particle): whether (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question. Illam is the feminine accusative singular form of ille/illa/illud (pron.): that, that one (that man, that woman, etc.); he, she, it. Potiōrem is the m/f accusative singular form of potior/potior/potius (3): preferable, better, more desirable; more powerful—the comparative form of potis/potis/pote (3): able. Putēs is the second person singular subjunctive form of putō, putāre, putāvī, putātum (1): to think, suppose, regard as (subjunctive because it’s in an indirect question).

–ne more rarely can introduce the second part. So you could have advolō maneōne? or advolōne maneōne? instead of advolōne an maneō?


Num

Num (interrog. particle): creates a question with the expected answer no or with a nuance of disbelief, caution, or tentativeness: does one really. . . ? is it possible? surely not? I don’t suppose that. . . ? does one by any chance. . . ? The question can be direct or indirect; when it’s indirect, num can be translated as whether (by any chance) or if (by any chance).
Num negare audes? —Cicero, Against Catiline 1.8
Translation

You do not have the effrontery to deny it, do you?

More literally: Do you dare to deny (it)?

Details

Num (interrog. particle): creates a question with the expected answer no or with a nuance of disbelief, caution, or tentativeness: does one really. . . ? is it possible? surely not? I don’t suppose that. . . ? does one by any chance. . . ? Negō, negāre, negāvī, negātum (1): to deny; refuse. Audēs is the second person singular form of audeō, audēre, ausus sum (2, semi-deponent): to dare.

Num quis membra sua tunc odit cum abscidit? —Seneca, On Anger 1.15.2
Translation

Does a man hate the members of his own body when he uses the knife upon them?

(Chicago:) Surely no one hates his own limbs when he amputates them, does he?

More literally: Does anyone hate his own limbs at the time when he cuts (them) off?

Details

(So nor should we feel hatred of a wrongdoer we expel from society.) Num (interrog. particle): creates a question with the expected answer no or with a nuance of disbelief, caution, or tentativeness: does one really. . . ? is it possible? surely not? I don’t suppose that. . . ? does one by any chance. . . ? Quis/qua/quid (indef. pron.): (in some clauses, especially after sī, nisi, num or nē) anyone, anything; someone, something. Membra is the accusative plural form of membrum, membrī (2n): limb; penis; portion. Sua: his (own)—the neuter accusative plural form of suus/sua/suum (1/2). Tunc (adv.): then, at that time, at the time. Ōdit is the third person singular form of ōdī, ōdisse, ōsum (irreg. ; perfect forms with present meaning): to hate. Cum (conj.): when; since; while; although. Abscīdit is the third person singular form of abscīdō, abscīdere, abscīdī, abscīsum (3): to cut off.

“Num quidnam,” inquam, “novi?” —Cicero, Letters to Friends 11.27.1
Translation

“Any news?” I asked.

More literally: “Anything (of) new?” I said.

Details

Num (interrog. particle): creates a question with the expected answer no or with a nuance of disbelief, caution, or tentativeness: does one really. . . ? is it possible? surely not? I don’t suppose that. . . ? does one by any chance. . . ? Quidnam: quis/qua/quid (indef. pron.): anyone, anything (used mostly after sī, nisi, num, and nē); the particle –nam adds strength to the question. Inquam (irreg. and defective): to say (inquam = I say or I said). Novī is the m/n (here n) genitive singular form of novus/nova/novum (1/2): new; young; fresh; recent; novel; strange (the partitive genitive).

Circumspiciebam tamen num quid me praeterisset. —Seneca the Elder, Controversies 9. pr.1
Translation

Yet I was pondering whether anything might have escaped me.

Details

Circumspiciēbam is the first person singular imperfect form of circumspiciō, circumspicere, circumspexī, circumspectum (3, –iō): to look around (for); ponder, consider. Tamen (adv.): nevertheless, yet, still. Num (interrog. particle): creates a question with the expected answer no or with a nuance of disbelief, caution, or tentativeness: does one really. . . ? is it possible? surely not? I don’t suppose that. . . ? does one by any chance. . . ? —or, when it starts an indirect question: whether (by any chance), if (by any chance). Quis/qua/quid (indef. pron.): anyone, anything (used mostly after sī, nisi, num, and nē). Mē is the accusative form of ego: I. Praeterīsset is the third person singular pluperfect subjunctive form of praetereō, praeterīre, praeteriī/praeterīvī, praeteritum (irreg.): to pass by; pass over, neglect; escape (the notice or memory of) (subjunctive because it’s in an indirect question).


Numquid

Numquid (interrog. particle) is a strengthened num, creating a question with the expected answer no or expressing the idea surely not? It’s often used in rhetorical questions. The word is made up of num and the indefinite pronoun quid (literally anything, used adverbially in the accusative to mean in any respect or to any degree).
Numquid invidiosum est? —Seneca, Epistles 19.2
Translation

(Chicago:) Surely no one can object to that.

More literally: Is it odious? (Surely not.)

Details

Numquid (interrog. particle) is a strengthened num, creating a question with the expected answer no. Invidiōsus/invidiōsa/invidiōsum (1/2): invidious, odious, exciting envy or hatred; envious. Est: is it.

Numquid ergo quisquam amat lucri causa? —Seneca, Epistles 9.11
Translation

Does anyone then love for the sake of gain?

Details

Numquid (interrog. particle) is a strengthened num, creating a question with the expected answer no. Ergō (particle): therefore, so, then. Quisquam/quicquam (pron.): anyone, anything. Amat is the third person singular form of amō, amāre, amāvī, amātum (1): to love. Lucrum, lucrī (2n): gain, profit. Causā is the ablative singular form of causa, causae (1f): trial; case; cause, reason; (in the ablative singular) for the sake (of).


Quidem

Quidem (particle): at any rate, at all events; indeed; at that, what is more. Quidem can supply emphasis that isn’t translated rigidly or explicitly. It often implies contrast with what was just said or will be said next. Or it can introduce an additional comment (often reinforcing what was just said).

Quidem is postpositive; it doesn’t come first in a clause. It tends to come directly after a word that it emphasizes (e. g. , ego quidem. . . = I at any rate. . .), but it can also emphasize whole clauses.

To create contrast with what’s just been said.

Hoc quidem certum habe. —Seneca, Epistles 57.9
Translation

(Chicago:) But of this, at least, you may be sure.

More literally: This, at any rate, hold certain.

Details

(He’s just noted hard questions about whether the mind is immortal.) Hoc is the neuter accusative singular form of hic/haec/hoc (pron.): this; he, she, it. Quidem (particle): at any rate, at all events; indeed; at that, what is more. Certum is the m/n accusative singular form of certus/certa/certum (1/2): certain. Habē is the singular imperative form of habeō, habēre, habuī, habitum (2): to have; hold, consider (certum habēre is an idiom: to know for a certainty).

Mors quidem omnium par est. —Seneca, Epistles 66.43
Translation

(Some of these departures may be regarded as better, some as worse.) But the act of dying is equal in all.

More literally: At any rate, the death of all is equal.

Details

Mors, mortis (3f): death. Quidem (particle): at any rate, at all events; indeed; at that, what is more. Omnium is the m/f/n (here m) genitive plural form of omnis/omnis/omne (3): all; every. Pār, paris (3, adj.): equal. Est: is.

To create contrast with what is to come: indeed yes, but—

Eicior quidem, sed tamquam exeam. —Seneca, Epistles 54.7
Translation

I am indeed thrust out, but it is as if I were going away willingly.

More literally: I am indeed thrust out, but as if I were walking out.

Details

(An approach to dying.) Ēicior is the first person singular passive form of ēiciō, ēicere, ēiēcī, ēiectum (3): to expel, throw out, thrust out. Quidem (particle): at any rate, at all events; indeed; at that, what is more. Sed (conj.): but. Tamquam (conj.): just as, like; as if (often takes a subjunctive verb). Exeam is the first person singular subjunctive form of exeō, exīre, exīvī/exiī, exitum (irreg.): to go out, exit, depart.

Introducing further comment: at that, what is more (often after et).

Crusta est et quidem tenuis. —Seneca, On Providence 6.4
Translation

It is a shell, and a thin one at that.

Details

(The apparent good fortune of wretched people.) Crusta, crustae (1f): the hard surface of a body, outer casing; rind, shell, crust, bark. Est: it is. Et (conj.): and. Quidem (particle): at any rate, at all events; indeed; at that, what is more. Tenuis/tenuis/tenue (3): thin, meager; modest, plain.

There’s a special use of quidem with the word nē. Nē. . . quidem means not even or neither/not either. See the entry on nē for discussion and examples. `


Quippe

Quippe (particle): for; of course, naturally, certainly, indeed, as is natural, as is to be expected; as being. (Can sometimes be left untranslated.)

Quippe can introduce a comment on a previous statement—an explanation of it, elaboration on it, or confirmation of it.

Quippe vetor fatis. —Virgil, Aeneid 1.39
Translation

Of course I am forbidden by the fates!

Details

(Juno is wondering aloud why she hasn’t stopped the Trojans, whom she hates, from heading to Italy.) Quippe (particle): for; of course, naturally, certainly, indeed, as is natural, as is to be expected; as being. Vetor is the first person singular passive form of vetō, vetāre, vetuī, vetitum (1): to forbid, veto. Fātīs is the ablative plural form of fātum, fātī (2n): fate.

Quippe minimis succidunt corpora. —Seneca the Elder, Suasoriae 2.2
Translation

Our bodies succumb to the least accident.

Details

(After saying: It was of weak material that god fashioned us. So quippe introduces a statement that elaborates on how the previous one is true. A translation of the word isn’t strictly necessary here, but it could be rendered as for.) Quippe (particle): for; of course, naturally, certainly, indeed, as is natural, as is to be expected; as being. Minimīs is the m/f/n ablative (or maybe dative) plural form of minimus/minima/minimum (1/2—used substantively): very small/smallest, least—the superlative form of parvus/parva/parvum (1/2): small, little. Succidunt is the third person plural form of succidō, succidere, succidī, — (3): to fall or give way under one; sink down, collapse. Corpora is the nominative plural form of corpus, corporis (3n): body.

Recte igitur diceres te restituisse? Quippe. —Cicero, In Defense of Caecina 55
Translation

Would you then be entitled to reply, “I have restored him”? Certainly.

More literally: Then would you rightly say yourself to have restored (him)? Certainly.

Details

Rēctē (adv.): rightly. Igitur (conj.): therefore, so, then. Dīcerēs is the second person singular imperfect subjunctive form of dīcō, dīcere, dīxī, dictum (3): to say (imperfect subjunctive because it’s present contrary to fact). Tē is the accusative form of tū: you (used reflexively: yourself). Restituisse is the perfect infinitive form of restituō, restituere, restituī, restitūtum (3): to replace, restore, rebuild, repair. Quippe (particle): for; of course, naturally, certainly, indeed, as is natural, as is to be expected; as being (this use of a standalone quippe answering a question is typically followed by an enim clause offering further explanation—which is what follows here).

Quippe can be followed by an explanatory relative clause, sometimes with an indicative verb but more often one in the subjunctive. The idea conveyed is similar to as can be expected from one who. . . , as is natural with one that. . . , as being one who. . . , inasmuch as he/she/it. . . , since he/she/it. . .

Transisse videtur modum, quippe qui ob eam causam a vita recesserit. —Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 4.40
Translation

He seems to have passed the limit, since he died of it.

More literally: He seems to have passed the limit, as being (one) who withdrew from life for that reason.

Details

(He’s making fun of the idea that distress is appropriate so long as it’s kept within a limit.) Trānsīsse is the perfect infinitive form of trānseō, trānsīre, trānsīvī/trānsiī, trānsitum (irreg.): to go across; pass; go beyond. Vidētur is the third person singular passive form of videō, vidēre, vīdī, vīsum (2): to see; (in the passive) seem. Modum is the accusative singular form of modus, modī (2m): quantity, measure; limit; moderation; way, manner. Quippe (particle): for; of course, naturally, certainly, indeed, as is natural, as is to be expected; as being. Quī/quae/quod (rel. pron.): who, which, that, what. Quippe followed by a form of quī/quae/quod = as can be expected from one who. . . , as is natural with one that. . . , as being one who. . . , inasmuch as he/she/it. . . , since he/she/it. . . (often with a subjunctive verb). Ob (prep.): toward; against; because of, for (takes the accusative). Eam is the feminine accusative singular form of is/ea/id (adj.): this, that. Causam is the accusative singular form of causa, causae (1f): cause, reason; (legal) case; situation. Ab/ā (prep.): (away) from; by (takes the ablative). Vītā is the ablative singular form of vīta, vītae (1f): life. Recesserit is the third person singular perfect subjunctive form of recēdō, recēdere, recessī, recessum (3): to recede, retreat, withdraw, leave.

Non estis extremi Syracusanorum, quippe qui aliis humilitatem obiciatis. —Livy, History of Rome 26.31.4
Translation

You are not the lowest of Syracusans, for you criticize the humble condition of others.

More literally: You are not the last of Syracusans (in importance), (you) being (ones) who bring up lowliness as a charge against others.

Details

(Quoting Marcus Claudius Marcellus, a Roman consul involved in the Second Punic War.) Nōn: not. Estis: you are (pl.). Extrēmī is the masculine nominative plural form of extrēmus/extrēma/extrēmum (1/2): situated at the end or edge; last; extreme; least in importance, lowest. Syrācūsānōrum is the m/n (here m) genitive plural form of Syrācūsānus/Syrācūsāna/Syrācūsānum (1/2): of Syracuse, Syracusan. Quippe (particle): for; of course, naturally, certainly, indeed, as is natural, as is to be expected; as being. Quī is the masculine nominative plural form of quī/quae/quod (rel. pron.): who, which, that, what. Quippe followed by a form of quī/quae/quod = as can be expected from one who. . . , as is natural with one that. . . , as being one who. . . , inasmuch as he/she/it. . . , since he/she/it. . . (often with a subjunctive verb). Aliīs is the m/f/n (here m) dative plural form of alius/alia/aliud (1/2, irreg.): other, another. Humilitātem is the accusative singular form of humilitās, humilitātis (3f): lowness; lowliness, humble condition, insignificance; submissiveness. Obiciātis is the second person plural subjunctive form of obiciō, obicere, obiēcī, obiectum (3, –iō): to throw (to); expose; throw against, reproach, bring up as a charge (against someone in the dative).

Similarly, quippe can be followed by a causal conjunction—often cum with a subjunctive verb—to convey the meaning as can be expected since. . . , as is natural when. . . , inasmuch as. . . , etc. :

Nec reprehendo, quippe cum ipse istam reprehensionem non fugerim. —Cicero, Letters to Atticus 10.3a.1
Translation

I don’t criticize, not having escaped similar criticism myself.

More literally: Nor do I criticize, as is natural since I haven’t escaped that criticism myself.

Details

Neque/nec: (conj.) and not, nor; (adv.) neither, not either, not even. Reprehendō, reprehendere, reprehendī, reprehēnsum (3): to seize; find fault with, censure, reprehend, criticize. Quippe (particle): for; of course, naturally, certainly, indeed, as is natural, as is to be expected; as being. Cum (conj.): when; since; while; although. Ipse/ipsa/ipsum (pron. or adj.): himself/herself/itself/myself/etc. Istam is the feminine accusative singular form of iste/ista/istud (adj.): that. Reprehēnsiōnem is the accusative singular form of reprehēnsiō, reprehēnsiōnis (3f): blame, censure; a particular criticism. Nōn: not. Fūgerim is the first person singular perfect subjunctive form of fugiō, fugere, fūgī, fugitūrus (3, –iō): to flee, run away, escape (subjunctive because it’s in a causal cum clause).

Or quippe can be combined with a single word or phrase such as an adjective, participle, noun phrase, or prepositional phrase, with a meaning like as can be expected from one who is. . . , as being. . . :

Sol Democrito magnus videtur, quippe homini erudito in geometriaque perfecto. —Cicero, On the Ends of Good and Evil 1.20
Translation

Democritus, being an educated man and well versed in geometry, thinks the sun is of vast size.

More literally: The sun seems large to Democritus, as can be expected from/being a man educated (in general) and accomplished in geometry.

Details

Sōl, sōlis (3m): sun. Dēmocritō is the dative singular form of Dēmocritus, Dēmocritī (2m): Greek philosopher. Magnus/magna/magnum (1/2): great, large. Vidētur is the third person singular passive form of videō, vidēre, vīdī, vīsum (2): to see; (in the passive) seem; be seen as, be thought, be deemed (with dative of the person holding the opinion). Quippe (particle): for; of course, naturally, certainly, indeed, as is natural, as is to be expected (from); as being. Hominī is the dative singular form of homō, hominis (3m): man, human. Ērudītō is the m/n dative singular form of ērudītus/ērudīta/ērudītum (1/2): learned, educated—originally the perfect passive participle of ērudiō, ērudīre, ērudiī/ērudīvī, ērudītum (4): to instruct, train, educate. In (prep.): (with abl.) in; (with acc.) into. Geōmetriāque: geōmetriā is the ablative singular form of geōmetria, geōmetriae (1f): geometry; the enclitic conjunction –que adds and. Perfectō is the m/n dative singular form of perfectus/perfecta/perfectum (1/2): perfect; complete; accomplished; fully developed—originally the perfect passive participle (having been completed) of perficiō, perficere, perfēcī, perfectum (3, –iō): to complete, finish; bring to perfection. Hominī ērudītō. . . perfectō is in the dative case because it refers to Dēmocritō. Since quippe here doesn’t start a new clause—it doesn’t have its own verb—the phrase after it is grammatically linked to the rest of the sentence (and to the word Dēmocritō in particular).


Utrum

Utrum (interrog. particle): starts a question, usually a two-part one: (whether). . . or? This word is typically paired with an ( = or), which appears before the second alternative. The question introduced by utrum can be direct or indirect. When it’s indirect, utrum is rendered as whether or if. When direct, it’s translated by arranging the English sentence as a question (do you. . . ? etc.).
Quid interest, utrum eiciar an transferar? —Seneca the Elder, Controversies (excerpts) 2.1.1
Translation

What difference does it make whether I am thrown out or handed over?

More literally: What does it matter/how does it make a difference whether I am thrown out or I am transferred?

Details

Quid is the neuter accusative singular form of quis/quis/quid (interrog. pron.): who? what? —neuter accusative singular used adverbially: in what respect? to what extent? why? how? Interest is the third person singular form of intersum, interesse, interfuī, interfutūrus (irreg.): to lie between; differ; (impersonally) to make a difference, matter. Utrum (interrog. particle): starts a question, usually a two-part one ((whether). . . or. . . ?); when the question is indirect, utrum is translated as whether or if. Ēiciar is the first person singular passive subjunctive form of ēiciō, ēicere, ēiēcī, ēiectum (3, –iō): to expel, throw out, drive out. An (interrog. particle): whether, if (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question. Trānsferar is the first person singular passive subjunctive form of trānsferō, trānsferre, trānstulī, trānslātum (3, irreg.): to carry over, transport; transfer. (Ēiciar and trānsferar are subjunctive because they’re in an indirect question.)

Utrum merito mihi ista accidunt an immerito? —Seneca, On the Firmness of the Wise Man 16.3
Translation

Do I, or do I not, deserve that these things befall me?

More literally: Are these things happening to me deservingly or undeservingly?

Details

Utrum (interrog. particle): starts a question, usually a two-part one ((whether). . . or. . . ?); when the question is indirect, utrum is translated as whether or if; when the question is direct, utrum isn’t translated with a particular word but just by arranging the sentence as a question (is it. . . ? do you. . . ? etc.). Meritō (adv.): deservedly, justly, rightly. Mihi: to me—the dative form of ego: I. Ista is the neuter nominative plural form of iste/ista/istud (pron.): that, this; he, she, it (these things). Accidunt is the third person plural form of accidō, accidere, accidī, — (3): to fall down, descend; come to pass, happen, occur, befall (takes a dative object). An (interrog. particle): whether, if (introducing an indirect question); or (in a question); it can also start a direct question. Immeritō (adv.): undeservedly, unjustly, without cause.

Confusion warning. Distinguish this word from the adjective-pronoun from which it’s derived, uter/utra/utrum (interrog. or rel. , 1/2, irreg.): which (of two)? whichever (of two), (the one out of two) who/that/which. Uter/utra/utrum has its own entry.